Posts

Showing posts from June, 2020

"Defund the police" literally?

In 2016 Salena Zito said supporters take Trump “ seriously but not literally .” Meanwhile, his detractors, including most of the mainstream press, “take him literally but not seriously.” ... I think this is true and is key to understanding how people feel about Trump. (I do feel his words are a real problem--they are hurting the country a lot). Literally Defunding the Police would unleash a wave of violence against people of all races that would make the KKK pale by comparison. Now about that slogan mainstream liberals are saying, "they don't mean that literally". Ok.. that is how thoughtful, tolerant conservatives feel about Trump. They say they don't agree with his words but continue to work with him on common goals. Liberals say mainstream conservatives should disavow Trump, refuse to work with him, refuse to support and be supported by him, not just disagree with him. Liberals say they disagree with Black Lives Matter on defunding the police, but th

2 radical conservative changes to the police--

These are radical changes but in accord with conservative principles. There is an alternative to making the Federal government even more powerful.  1. Local control. Control by a city of 3 million, more people than were in the whole United States in 1789, is not that local. It is quite reasonable that neighborhoods want to choose police that reflect their values and priorities. And even their ethnic group. I don't support affirmative action in any other case, but I do here. A precedent--Candidates for the military academies like West Point are not chosen only by merit. They are nominated by each congressman. The Founding Fathers wanted the military to be representative of the people. Let different neighborhoods choose their police, make the rules, and own the hard choices between public safety and respecting the rights of suspects. 2. Reduce the power of police unions.   (Aside to fellow conservatives: think about police unions the way you think about other government e

police shot 15 unarmed black men last year

Image
They shoot about 1000 people of all races per year, 250 black.  In 2019 it was 1004 people, 249 black.  (references in   References for Police shoot 15 unarmed black men per year  ) 94% of them were armed, 67% were attacking  (directly threatening the life of) the officer. Some of the rest also "posed a significant threat".  56 were unarmed , 25 white and 15 black .  Police shootings database 2015-2020 - Washington Post    (Subscription needed) https://github.com/washingtonpost/data-police-shootings    (Free download, raw data) 37 were unarmed and not attacking the officer. 19 of them were attacking.  Of those 37, 11  were black, 13 were white (rest Hispanic or Other).  Some of those shootings are very questionable and all should be investigated. Even one unnecessary shooting is a tragedy and a crime (literally).  But there are not thousands or hundreds of unarmed black men being shot by police, that you never hear of.  There are also

in reply to Facebook post "peaceful protesting is NOT the answer"

in reply to Facebook post "peaceful protesting  is NOT the answer": Just talking about what happened, not what SHOULD have happened: As I remember it- from 1955 to 1965 blacks tried peaceful protest. They often suffered violence but made more progress than ever before or since. In 10 years they went from legally enforced segregation to discrimination being illegal. Then some resorted to violence, only some but they created a lot violence, and many leaders condemned it only weakly.  White support dropped dramatically. Since then progress has been slow. General reflection on the times We lived through the nuclear arms race, riots of the 60s, 18% inflation, predicted environmental catastrophe in 10 years (predicted 1975), 25% and 50% drops in stock market. Everytime there were predictions and real fear of much worse. The worst case never happened. It usually doesn't.

Many rush to blame Antifa, white supremacists for unrest, but few offer evidence

I also searched news stories. There were a lot of stories repeating the claims, but without hard evidence. There are some later that noticed there is not much evidence-- Many rush to blame antifa, white supremacists for George Floyd unrest, but few offer evidence to back claims - Chicago Tribune   The mayor and police commissioner have attributed some of the violence during the protests to unidentified groups from outside the city and state, but there did not seem to be evidence of that overnight. - Looters Strike at Macy’s and Midtown Manhattan During Protests - The New York Times The extremists taking part in riots across the US: What we do and don't know  - CNNPolitics https://www.cnn.com/2020/05/31/politics/outside-influence-extremists-riots-us/index.html (CNN) — Law enforcement and federal officials say outside elements from both far-right and far-left groups are helping fuel the violent and damaging confrontations that have marred protests across the count

"White supremacists/Antifa rioting"? Show me the videos

A lot of people on Facebook, as well as the President, Mayors and others, have been claiming that most of the destruction was caused by White Supremacists or Antifa. If this is true there should be many photos and videos of it happening.  I searched Google images for the last week for "white supremacists riot". There isn't much to see. So this is probably today's Fake News. Don't spread it. If you believe it, find evidence.  I looked at the first 20 hits. I looked for whites committing violence . Is that "racial profiling"? Well, maybe, but I don't think many blacks are White Nationalists. With Antifa it's harder to tell, but I believe they are mostly white and college educated.   2 videos clearly showing whites vandalizing: Far-Right Infiltrators and Agitators in George Floyd Protests: Indicators of White Supremacists   video #1 nothing clear  video #2  https://twitter.com/i/status/1266661155994550272 does  show whites s