LAReader48

I don't think most men have been going around raping or using job power to pressure women into sex. It may well be limited to 10% or less of men who are powerful, arrogant and without good character. It may be limited to the super-successful men who women throw themselves at like groupies.  The average man doesn't even have power to pressure women if he wanted to. The average man is lucky if he has sex with one woman, if he's nice to her. And the MeToo movement is mostly limited to Hollywood and politics so far. Not much from mainstream business even concerning CEOs and billionaires.

 They also ignore that our legal system recognizes that judges are real people who sometimes have intense positions, which is why judges don’t decide their own cases or cases in which they have a personal connection; instead they recuse themselves.  https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2018/10/04/on_the_question_of_judicial_temperament_138257.html

It's common to blame Christianity for environmental problems, resulting from its view of man as above nature.  A while ago I came upon this book review, by a secular environmentalist, which points to the Enlightenment as a key to the destruction of nature in the Industrial Revolution:  ... early Enlightenment thinkers like Francis Bacon or Rene Descartes thought of nature as so much booty for humanity to pillage and condoned eco-cidal acts. Johan Hari http://www.slate.com/articles/arts/books/2009/01/move_over_thoreau.html Another is here: Take, for example, John Locke’s assertion that nature without man is wasted and therefore if any man were to use his labour to harvest land then it should belong to him. Joe Dyke https://gapsinthedialogue.wordpress.com/2009/10/26/the-environment-and-the-enlightenment/#more-81 And it is not hard to believe with a little reflection--while Christianity portrays man and nature as Gods creatures (with man over nature)...

 Much of this restraint has been for the sake of children, who by the nature of their existence confound liberal concepts of the person and social relations. http://www.thegospelcoalition.org/article/the-principles-of-the-new-sexual-morality

Homosexuality and American Psychiatry: The Politics of Diagnosis: Ronald Bayer: 9780691028378: Amazon.com: Books from review of: He summarizes, "The entire process, from the first confrontations organized by gay demonstrators at psychiatric conventions to the referendum demanded by orthodox psychiatrists, seemed to violate the most basic expectations about how questions of science should be resolved. Instead of being engaged in a sober consideration of data, psychiatrists were swept up in a political controversy... The result was not a conclusion based on the approximation of a scientific truth as dictated by reason, but was an action demanded by the ideological temper of the times." (Pg. 3-4)